Noll sums up the situation at the time of the Scopes Trial:

John Scopes (

Free scopes trial Essays and Papers - 123HelpMe

Teaching from an evolutionary text, Scopes broke the law and gained the attention of the National media. The concentration of the media on the Scopes Trial effectively presented the contrasting ideas of a religious town and...

Henry Morris claims Price confronted Bryan about his old-earth views before the Scopes Trial.

Free scopes trial papers, essays, and research papers.

A major factor of why the Scopes trial had received so much attention in such an insignificant town was because of the stage the trial was played out on....

Both ‘Dry September’ and ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ are loosely based on the Scottsboro Trial; ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ is the better commentary.

In the contemporary public sphere, the most prominent interactionbetween science and religion concerns evolutionary theory andcreationism/Intelligent Design. The legal battles (e.g., theKitzmiller versus Dover trial in 2005) and lobbying surrounding theteaching of evolution and creationism in American schools suggest thatreligion and science conflict. However, even if one were to focus onthe reception of evolutionary theory, the relationship betweenreligion and science is complex. For instance, in the United Kingdom,scientists, clergy, and popular writers, sought to reconcile scienceand religion during the nineteenth and early twentieth century, whereas the United States saw the rise of a fundamentalistopposition to evolutionary thinking, exemplified by the Scopes trialin 1925 (Bowler 2001, 2009).

Scopes Trial Essay - 1023 Palabras | Cram

Most trial pages include a 750-1000-word essay on the historical background of the case, links to biographies (roughly 500 words) of key figures in the trials, and approximately 15-25 primary documents related to each trial, including transcripts of testimony, media coverage, depositions, and government documents.

Essays on scopes trial | zopobarnacheenifecrorelfestger

It includes fascinating treatments of over 50 of the most prominent court trials in American history, including: Scopes "Monkey" Trial (1925); Rosenberg Trial (1951); Leopold and Loeb Trial (1924); Salem Witchcraft Trials (1692); Scottsboro Trials (1931-1937); Bill Haywood Trial (1907); My Lai Courts Martial (1970); Nuremberg Trials (1945-49); Dakota Conflict Trials (1862); Mississippi Burning Trial (1967); Chicago Seven Conspiracy (1969-70); Johnson Impeachment Trial (1868); O.J.

Essay- scopes trial, According to J

In the early chapters of this book, Larson provides readers with a perceptive summary of the concerns that animated conservative Protestants in their rejection of Darwinism. Although many fundamentalists warned that the Darwinian theory implied that God worked capriciously and cruelly, what ultimately led them to press for antievolution legislation was their conviction that the idea of human evolution conflicted with the biblical narrative and provided support for a view of the social order that substituted rapacious self-interest for the ethics of Jesus. But one of the many virtues of Larson’s narrative of the events surrounding the trial of John T. Scopes is the distinction that he makes between the religious considerations that led many Protestant fundamentalists to press for antievolution legislation and the issues of public policy that became manifest in the wake of the passage of the Butler Act in Tennessee and the trial that followed.

History Assignment Help, Essay- scopes trial, According to J

In recent years the charge that religion receives inadequate attention in treatments of American history has become increasingly common. Even those who advance that charge, however, would readily concede that discussion of the 1925 Scopes “monkey trial” in Dayton, Tennessee has become a staple of the textbook trade. Yet, as Edward Larson eloquently demonstrates in his justly celebrated Summer for the Gods, most of the chroniclers of that trial have oversimplified – often even distorted – the trial’s major issues and consequences because they have tended to draw their interpretations of it from simplistic popular retellings of the events in Frederick Lewis Allen’s Only Yesterday and stage and screen productions of Inherit the Wind. Eschewing that approach, Larson bases his own narrative on an intelligent discussion of the concerns that led conservative Protestant evangelicals to attempt to ban the teaching of human evolution in the public schools in Tennessee, a careful consideration of what actually happened (and did not happen) at the Scopes trial itself, and an incisive analysis of the impact of that trial on American religious and intellectual life.