nice good it help me in competition
Do you ever find that young people, when they have left school, notonly forget most of what they have learnt (that is only to be expected),but forget also, or betray that they have never really known, how to tacklea new subject for themselves? Are you often bothered by coming across grown-upmen and women who seem unable to distinguish between a book that is sound,scholarly, and properly documented, and one that is, to any trained eye,very conspicuously none of these things? Or who cannot handle a librarycatalogue? Or who, when faced with a book of reference, betray a curiousinability to extract from it the passages relevant to the particular questionwhich interests them?
It features schooland community news and dates.
What, then, are we to do? We cannot go back to the Middle Ages. Thatis a cry to which we have become accustomed. We cannot go back--or canwe? Distinguo. I should like every term in that proposition defined. Does"go back" mean a retrogression in time, or the revision of anerror? The first is clearly impossible per se; the second is a thing whichwise men do every day. "Cannot"-- does this mean that our behavioris determined irreversibly, or merely that such an action would be verydifficult in view of the opposition it would provoke? Obviously the twentiethcentury is not and cannot be the fourteenth; but if "the Middle Ages"is, in this context, simply a picturesque phrase denoting a particulareducational theory, there seems to be no a priori reason why we shouldnot "go back" to it--with modifications--as we have already "goneback" with modifications, to, let us say, the idea of playing Shakespeare'splays as he wrote them, and not in the "modernized" versionsof Cibber and Garrick, which once seemed to be the latest thing in theatricalprogress.
Hi, I have a doubt. For an agree/disagree essay, and if only one opinion is mentioned in the question, Do I still have to write about both sides of the topic? ( I mean advantages and disadvantages or only the ones we agree or disagree)
A collaboration with A visual essay by Xaquín G.V.
Berman cites studies that have concluded that structured civiceducation curriculum designed to teach civics to students didacticallyis not effective in imparting a sense of social responsibility in students.
They practiced until they read smoothly and with expression.
These external and internal organizational realities help to shape thecore values inherent in students educational experiences-- namely, a schoolscurriculum.
Unless … ... Nah, it can't be … ... Right? …
This traditionalpedagogy relies on didactic, authoritative learning methodologies in whichthe teacher is viewed as the "expert" with knowledge to impart to the students.
We really asked 'how to boil an egg'
Here is a sentence from no less academic a source than a front- pagearticle in the Times Literary Supplement: "The Frenchman, Alfred Epinas,pointed out that certain species (e.g., ants and wasps) can only face thehorrors of life and death in association." I do not know what theFrenchman actually did say; what the Englishman says he said is patentlymeaningless. We cannot know whether life holds any horror for the ant,nor in what sense the isolated wasp which you kill upon the window-panecan be said to "face" or not to "face" the horrorsof death. The subject of the article is mass behavior in man; and the humanmotives have been unobtrusively transferred from the main proposition tothe supporting instance. Thus the argument, in effect, assumes what itset out to prove--a fact which would become immediately apparent if itwere presented in a formal syllogism. This is only a small and haphazardexample of a vice which pervades whole books--particularly books writtenby men of science on metaphysical subjects.
'How to kiss', 'how to tell if a guy likes you'
In his [Ehman 1980] extensive review ofthe political socialization literature, he found that open classroom climatespromoted democratic values, enhanced efficacy, and encouraged participationwhile closed climates promoted authoritarian values and had a negativeimpact on efficacy and participation.